time (a rebuttal)

"But, because your lovingkindness is better than life, behold, my life is but a distraction."
-Augustine



Time

beginning of time = starting point

            |------------------------------>

like a point at the beginning of a line in math class, continuing on into the future as represented by an arrow.     *--------->


but an absolute beginning seems to imply two necessities-  one; the thing itself that is beginning and, two; a FORCE that is pushing this thing into motion.  Aka. What good is it for time to have a beginning if it were just standing still?   I can't think of one example in nature that shows a beginning NOT being put into effect by some prior cause or chain of events -  FORCE.

the newborn's life begins.  Why?  the parents did the nasty.  the wind starts to blow?  why?  atmospheric such and such conditions.  a star is born.  why?  a host of scientific explanations.  you start to dance because you will it, you start to work because you need to, you start to play because you want to.  But it seems there's always a force behind it.


So what was before the beginning of time to cause time except eternity or something eternal (something outside of time)?

If eternity exists, time is ultimately finite.   And, again, based on natural observation - time runs out for everything eventually, where's the precedent to indicate that time will not run out in and of itself? 

eternity is something that cannot be measured by time - even if time extended and ran continuously (...) , eternity would be, figuratively, one step to infinite steps ahead of it.  FOR EXAMPLE:  even if an extreme number of years passed, say, the number 1 follow by a jillion zeroes after it (1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,
000,000...)
eternity would still be an INfinite number of times longer than this.  All that is not eternal is eternally out of date.


If time is finite (which is the definition of time , it seems , because an infinite time would in itself no longer be classified as time but eternity) then the start and end of time must imply a force outside of time that put time into motion in the first place and end it at the last.

this force, then, by definition, must exist outside of time .  therefore this force is eternal.

what is eternal cannot die because it always exists.

if it always exists, it is constant.

if it is constant, it is unchangeable.

if it is unchangeable, it is absolute

if it is absolute it is ultimate

if it is ultimate it is truth

if it is truth, all else is lie.

if it is a lie, it is not ultimate.  if it is not ultimate, then not absolute.  if it is not absolute, it is changeable.  if changeable, not constant.

if not constant, not eternal.

if not eternal, then finite.

if its finite, it will die....


This is the cornerstone of the problem with evolutionary theory attempting to explain the complete origins of the universe.    If time is infinite, aside from being an oxymoron, it would imply NO beginning but evolutionary theories ALWAYS assert beginnings or it would not be evolution.  To admit eternity into the discussion is to jump from the naturalist to the supernaturalist camp, as in most atheists dont believe in eternity.  And this of course poses a serious problem to one who's trying to assert a scientific explanation for the beginning of existence , when and if in fact  there was no such thing as the beginning to explain scientifically, because there was technically never such a thing as the beginning.
and if thats the case, all these precious theories are shot to dust.


Therefore, the first event in the evolutionary theory MUST account for the beginning of time AND NOT just the beginning of matter.  I mean, even if the beginning of time and the beginning of matter were two completely separate things - i suspect you'd have backed yourself into a corner when you realize that you're saying that SOMETHING just up and appeared inside of NOTHING.    Matter just "up and appearing" inside of VOID time is about as likely as a cosmos, a cadillac, or a quark suddenly appearing inside of a completely sealed vaccuum that has not even the smallest particle of anything inside it.  It's EMPTY.  things dont appear for no reason inside of empty space.   We're not talking magic tricks, we're talking evolution.  and even evolution needs a base particle to grow.    and this example is beyond empty space, its a VOID.  and beyond a void, for its the FIRST AND ORIGINAL VOID, before all and anything that had fullness of any type could have possibly interefered.


So where did the big bang ball come from?  It just always existed?  Then why did it wait LITERALLY an eternity before spontaneously (without outside force, because there was no outside, because it was the first all-encompassing event, remember?)  exploded?  Are we being scandalous enough to propose that the big bang ball existed from eternity yet no longer exists?  It had no beginning yet definitely had an end?!?!?!?!?!?!?  How could something that had never begun, end?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!?   Thats like me saying my cousin Jigglypuff died.  And when somebody asks me "Oh , that's too bad - how old was he?"  I reply "Well, technically he was never born."

GIVE.  ME.  A.   BREAK.

 Is time even constant?  As in, flows at the same rate always?  Is time constant on Neptune?  How bout in the Orion constellation?  Oh, well how about on this same planet 300,000 years ago?  time is a constant because we as men measure it as a constant but time theoretically and technically could shift and speed up dramatically in a one day span and you could wake up 90 years old tomorrow.   and it need not have anything to do with something as relative as the earths revolutionary rate around the sun.

its amazing the things we think we know but really have  no idea about.  We claim "Those idiot creationists!!!"  are stupid because we've evolved to outthink the concept of God, yet we can hardly tie our theoretical shoes because we have no idea  - NO IDEA REALLY - about some of the most basic fundamentals and fabrics of our own existence. 

and we haven't even approached the topic of LIFE generating from NON LIVING CHEMICALS and material.  there is SO much we dont know.  So i think its best we shy away from the poppy extremist super proud know-it-all notion of the left wing society of atheists and move towards a more humble position in the world.  it only takes three words:  "I"  "Don't"  "Know"

and when we're open to not knowing, we're open to hearing all sides of the argument.  And if our ears are open - watch out - we might actually hear something we might not have expected and end up like this dude johnlanguage who once swore up and down there was no God and certainly no Jesus, yet ended up losing friends (yes, and a whole life) for refusing to roll over and blind his eyes again to the One that tore the rock away from the tomb of his heart and caused it to beat again with a Life he never knew.   

Yes, the cost is high.  But if its the TRUTH, isnt it worth it?




absolutely.


Obama 4 Prez

Yep.  I made these real quick after finding disturbing stories and pictures on the internet of  retarded "obama mamas"  brainwashing their children into becoming living political propaganda for their flavor of the month candidate.   

They wouldnt link correctly in my post so im going to reply to this post with them in a comment


drive me crazy


I'm sorry, but if I see one more fake uberliberal wanker waving a sign comparing ANYONE to Adolf Hitler I'm going to flip out.  Why is it such an easy accusation to throw about?  Are 10-15 million dead - 7-8 million of them in gas chambers and 'experiments' and deathcamps something so lightly tossed about like playtime in the bubblebath?  Look, I understand you dont like Sheriff Joe Arpaio or George Bush or WHOEVER - any maybe neither do I - but last I checked these dudes didnt run the country with an impossible iron fist while committing full fledged genocide with the assent of the manipulated populace.  Assholes, if Bush was Hitler you'd probably be on board with the final solution because apparently your stupid asses cant differentiate between stupid and evil, so whats supposed to make me think you can differentiate between right and a very eloquently delivered wrong.   Adolf Hitler was ADORED - *ADORED* - and Bush is hated, wheres the comparison?  Next time a Messianic anti-christ comes around to lead the world into the new frontier I'll have my eye on you to see if you're flag waving, pinned lapel havin' , full fledged supporters of the next third reich.  Garbage.





hu'vay'e

i guess thats how the locals phonetically pronounce hawaii.  you know, if you're ever looking to visit hawaii and you're looking for picture perfect beaches DONT go to the Big Island.  This island is like 95% lava rock beaches and for all you mainlanders stepping on lava rocks feels like stepping on broken shards of pottery.  Its all sharp yet extremely fragile so you could technically both cut your foot half off AND fall through the rock into a lava tube.  My town is situated underneath a live volcano...  we actually live on the side of the volcanic mountain.  If that thing were to ever blow up , we'd all be screwed.  Actually, there's a volcano blowing up right now for the first time in some decades.  Its like 1 1/2 hours from here....  

i know this is all pointless crap  but did you know Pompei was from the eruption of Mount Vesuvius which is IN modern day Italy?   Yeah!  I think its Naples, this huge ass city is perched right on the side of the volcano that already kicked at least one other city's ass.  Just ask all the weird frozen ash people...

as for sandy beaches, go to Ka'uai......... its the shiznittlebamsnappy

temp agencyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy yikes

so my real job as a carpenter for a company kindof dried up lately and i was forced to look for a temp job in between REAL jobs....  I landed one (something very underwhelming that im overqualified for) w/ a company who's out in the middle of Rich ass white person Hawaii doing a house with a price tag of $160 million dollars.

yes, i said $160 million dollars.  and its completely ridiculous.  The outside is panelled with finish wood all the way around and underneath....  OH and its actually ten buildings instead of one house - one separate building for each room.  his office, her office, master bedroom, kids room, humongous kitchen and dining room/hall , a nanny quarters, jacuzzi, two $40,000 outdoor stone bathtubs, a sweet gazeebo, like 6 spare bedrooms (huge), 3 basements, a crazy big lawn with a crazy spectacular view of the ocean, 2 swimming pools - 1 with big expensive water slide, and a host of other ridiculous crap 3 people could never possibly need.   Seriously, they probably logged half of Thailand for that place, not to mention all the gas and other environmental atrocities committed in the name of their frivolousness.

The rafters are $900 EACH.  EACH.  there's like 30 full time construction workers there, with probably another 20 outside people.  9 painters.  like 9 tile guys, 5 a.c. guys etc etc etc...

the couple shows up every now and then.  she looks like an aged "Tennis Barbie" of like 50 years old and the dude looks like anatomically incorrect Ken .  Sometimes I think about how cool it would be for some environmental extremist people to purposely go work for a construction temp agency in a place like Hawaii and get placed somewhere like this house, work a couple days on the job and wait til the owners show up .  Then they could jump all over them about tacky tennis lifestyles, frivolous wastes of being, spoiled little zombie children, and the fact that they regularly took shits in the walls before sealing  them up with drywall...      

but in reality theyd probably just spraypaint "meat is murder" on the kitchen door in the first five minutes they're there and get their ass beat by some huge angry local hawaiian construction guy.  Especially if the greenie is white. 

sunday drive

Its funny.  Sometimes I'm watching gameshows or something and I do a doubletake when they state their age at 27 or 28 and look at them again and SWEAR that to me these people look at least 35 years old.  This has happened like 3 times in the past 3 days.  you're 28?  What the heck have you been doing?!  I know 28 year olds who look like 28 year olds or younger but man is it depressing to watch someone else who you've already written off as middle aged come out and say they're the same age as you.  Do i look that old?!?!?!  Maybe its the bald spot i've had since i was 20. 

anyway, the democrats are eating eachother alive and its painful to watch.  im no johnny mac fan nor a republican by any means but its painfully obvious that if the press can roll out Jeremiah Wright quotes at will (ie - Italians as "garlic noses" and our  white supremacist govt in charge of the Ku Klux  Klan...)  then its gonna be a loooooooooooooong and hard battle in November.    What the heck is a garlic nose anyway? 

On a side note, for any SWHS alumni reading this:  What the hell WAS that barn in East Windsor anyway?  You know, the one that was apparently a dance hall for awhile that was rumored to be the meeting place for the Ct KKK ....   twostripe tim would know....  joe too maybe?

until next time, garlic noses...

did i really just go see annie get your gun?

yeppers.  i'm kind of a stagehand/set designer kind of dork and me and the wife always talked about checking out a stage show down at the local theater.  to tell you the truth, small town productions especially scare the crap out of me b/c their local pool of talent is generally about as deep as a kiddie pool.  but we went, and i was surprised to make these stunning observations:

annie get your gun is famous.  like, that song there's "no business like show business" totally comes from that show.  as well assssss "anything you can do i can do better........."  Two songs i think the general american public would recognize but not be able to place.   it belongs on a Who Wants to be a Millionaire question..

the show was alright, and i stress _alright_ , but the people who stole the show, a family actually, were the ones we were sitting next to.

i dont wanna bash little chubby kids too much here - afterall, i kindof was one.  But OH MY GOSH i thought it was all just a mean stereotype.  This mother had three EXTREMELY overweight young kids, aged like 3 to 9, that she dragged to this 3 hour long stage show...  Now, right off the bat any reasonable person that hears that is thinking "bad idea bad idea,"  but not this lady.  Not only did she bring them, but she bought them - literally - 2 large sodas each to go with about 6 of the biggest, most fattening homemade cookies you can buy.  EACH. 

the kids were freaking bouncing up and down on the chairs, sitting on top of the backrest, crying "how much longer momma?" , kicking the chairs in front of them, touching/hitting the heads of the people in front of them, fiddling with empty styrofome soda cups and making that HORRIBLE plastic straw-in-a-tight-space noise (for 20 minutes)... and the mom didnt do A THING!!   At one point, she had the littlest one sitting on her lap chewing ice cubes for 15 minutes, loud as hell!!!!  i mean, what's louder and more annoying that a 3 year old chewing ice cubes in a quiet theater???  it was totally unbelieveable and it got me thinking.

Sometimes, and i mean sometimes:  having super obese children is a sign of neglect.  Watching the interactions between kids and mom you could see the virtual lack of parenting being replaced by the placating of every whine, cry, scream and complaint of the child. 

Kid crying in a theater?  Buy him a cookie. Need to buy more time??  Buy him 6 cookies.  Kid crying at home?  Give him a ding-dong.  Kid crying that he's thirsty?  Give him a 64 oz jumbo coke to shut him the f#ck up for 4 1/2 minutes. 

 Now i understand ritalin.  in lieu of parenting, it's placate or opiate

wal mart fun

its been awhile since ive been back east, but i remember last time i was there Wal Mart had yet to completely take over as the department store of choice.  In L.A., it's Target.  Wal Mart is in Crenshaw (the 'hood)  and is literally shopped at by 99% black people.  its 2 or 3 stories high, like a Super Duper Wal Mart mini mall or something and its packed all the time.  But in Hawaii, it's all Wal Mart all the time.  We have a K Mart but, like Ct, nobody really goes/went there.  Wal Mart's the only gig in town around here.

I bought a brita water filter yesterday, one of the kind you replace in your container once a month.  it was a single pack and i opened it up and found that someone had craftily scotch taped the plastic packaging back together.  Upon further inspection, someone had taped the outside box back together too.  And (presumably) returned it to Walmart who promptly put it back on the shelves without question. 

The best i can figure, people are probably just returning their old, used filters for $8.00 a pop when they buy new ones.  Or rather, completely tampering with the filters, filling them with cyanide and finely chopped ass hairs while WalMart is complicitly re-selling them because its cheaper than ordering new ones from Brita.  Either way, they make it damned easy to return those things...   that's like, buying a package of condoms and poking pinholes in all of them and then returning them...

what i really wanted to say was:

since when did barack obama become the new hannah montana?  he's already got the mass hysteria fainting spells, all he needs now is a blonde wig.  when politics = ridiculously illogical frenzy over a candidate, people like adolf hitler take over based on the power of good public speaking ability and hype.    Funny, the absolute worst thing that could happen in a democratic process is the exact thing every campaign manager holds as a best case scenario for their candidate.

 

not that barack is necessarily an evil dude.  im just saying... there was such a thing as hitlermania at one point, too.   

post preview

my posts havent been working and then i saw the little box to the left, the preview post box.  i havent been here for awhile and maybe its just me, but its easy to not see that box and think that the post has gone through once you already hit the big publish post button on the bottom...  anyway,

had enough

i finally did it. i switched my blogs4me history over to only my favorites cuz im tired of missing people who i care about's stuff because it got buried by someone like copy pasting like entire books of the bible (?) consecutively blog after blog, or 14 year olds writing crying about something for like 2 lines, or the 15 somebodies a week writing their first blog and never coming back again. newbies are cool and all, but most of them just clog up my site history...

sunbeam

funny. i went to borders one time out here (because its the only thing to do in town). It was a friday night and they were apparently having an open mic. things were O.K. i guess up until this couple came up with a keyboard, and instead of playing something on the actual keys, they turned on one of the prerecorded tracks the keyboard came with and POOF lo and behold they'd written a song to it. all i remember, really, was some horrible off key singnig about rainbows on my mind and sunbeams and singing together to a preset on a huge old plastic keyboard the guy was holding up to the microphone like a guitar and not playing...
small town open mic with neo-hippies.


C.S. Lewis (leads in to the following by speaking about the difference between looking at a sunbeam from the side, or from dead on - ie seeing dust floating in a ray of sun coming in a dark room through a crack in the door, or looking dead on the sunbeam and seeing trees and sky and grass or whatever else is outside the door).

"A young man meets a girl. The whole world looks different when he sees her. Her voice reminds him of something he has been trying to remember all his life, and ten minutes casual chat with her is more precious than all the favours that all other women in the world could grant. He is, as they say, 'in love'. Now comes a scientist and describes this young man's experience from the outside. For him it is all an affair of the young man's genes and a recognized biological stimulus. This is the different between looking _along_ the sexual impulse and looking _at_ it."

VIVA EL CHE (guevara on guevara) for dummies

che is cool. really really cool. im gonna go buy his shirt and not have the faintest idea who he was outside of a largely fictional movie (motorcycle diaries) overseen by a pillar of the cuban communist party (che's real life friend from the movie).
And in case anyone's forgotten, commies are the kings of propaganda and censorship. I think we've all forgotten this. For anyone who's interested, there's boatloads of information on Cuban refugees and exiles who knew firsthand of Guevara. Afterall, Guevara was the author behind Cuba's secret police, and had at one point in time apparently taken to signing his name "Stalin II"

Or you could go look up bullsh!t stories perpetuated by the same propaganda machine that used his image to prop him up as an idol and great propagandic tool - after apparently sending him onto a suicide mission in bolivia. Castro was quoted as saying to a comrade going to meet Che in the jungle of Bolivia not to "offer even an asprin" to help him. Apparently Fidel was making sure Che couldnt steal Castro's glory... but whatever, right? rage against the machine is cool, and they say che is cool, therefore he's cool... right?






"To send men to the firing squad, judicial proof is unnecessary...These procedures are an archaic bourgeois detail. This is a revolution! And a revolutionary must become a cold killing machine motivated by pure hate. We must create the pedagogy (teaching) of the The Wall! (execution wall)" --Ernesto 'Che' Guevara

"Crazy with fury I will stain my rifle red while slaughtering any enemy that falls in my hands! My nostrils dilate
while savoring the acrid odor of gunpowder and blood. With the deaths of my enemies I prepare my being for
the sacred fight and join the triumphant proletariat with a bestial howl!"


"Hatred as an element of struggle; unbending hatred for the enemy, which pushes a human being beyond his
natural limitations, making him into an effective, violent, selective, and cold-blooded killing machine. This is
what our soldiers must become … " Che Guevara



180 DOCUMENTED VICTIMS OF CHÉ GUEVARA IN CUBA: 1957 TO 1959

From: Armando M. Lago, Ph.D., Cuba. The Human Cost of Social Revolutions, unedited

Manuscript pending publication. Information provided by the TRUTH RECOVERY ARCHIVE ON CUBA

an undertaking of the FREE SOCIETY PROJECT, INC.

The exact number of Che’s Cuban victims has not been verified, but include people he personally

executed and those put to death under his orders. Che’s biographers consistently report that he sent

thousands to the firing squad. Over 4,000 deaths are documented to have taken place in Cuba, mostly

firing squad execution, in the first three years after Fidel Castro’s takeover (1959-1962). Che Guevara

was one of the regime’s chief executioners during this period and is said to have acknowledged ordering

"several thousand" executions. All took place without affording the victims fair trials and due process of law.

The following list is not exhaustive and only includes cases for which historic reference is known. Names are

cited as reported; dates and additional details for most are available. Combat deaths caused by Che in Cuba

and killings in countries where he led guerrilla operations have not been tallied.

14 executed by Che in the Sierra Maestra during the anti-Batista guerrilla struggle (1957-1958):

1. ARISTIDIO 2. MANUEL CAPITÁN 3. JUAN CHANG 4. “BISCO” ECHEVARRÍA 5. ECHEVARRÍA BROTHER #1

6. ECHEVARRÍA BROTHER #2 7. EUTIMIO GUERRA 8. DIONISIO LEBRIGIO 9. JUAN LEBRIGIO 10. “EL NEGRO” NÁPOLES

11. “CHICHO” OSORIO 12. ONE UNIDENTIFIED TEACHER (“EL MAESTRO) 13.-14. 2 UNIDENTIFIED PEASANTS

10 executed in Santa Clara at Che’s orders in only two days (January 1959):

1. RAM"N ALBA 2. JOSÉ BARROSO 3. JOAQUÍN CASILLAS 4. FÉLIX CRUZ 5. ALEJANDRO GARCÍA OLAY"N

6. HÉCTOR MIRABAL 7. J. MIRABAL 8. FÉLIX MONTANO 9. CORNELIO ROJAS 10. VILALLA


156 executed at La Cabaña Fortress prison at Che Guevara’s orders:

1. VILAU ABREU 2. HUMBERTO AGUIAR 3. GERMÁN AGUIRRE 4. PELAYO ALAY"N 5. JOSÉ LUIS ALFARO

6. PEDRO ALFARO 7. MARIANO ALONSO 8. JOSÉ ALVARO 9. ANIELLA 10. MARIO ARES POLO

11. JOSÉ RAM"N BACALLAO 12. CEVERINO BARRIOS 13. EUGENIO BÉCQUER 14. FRANCISCO BÉCQUER

15. RAM"N BISCET 16. ROBERTO CALZADILLA 17. EUFEMIO CANO 18. JUAN CAPOTE FIALLO

19. ANTONIO CARRALERO 20. GERTRUDIS CASTELLANOS 21. JOSÉ CASTA'O QUEVEDO 22. RAÚL CASTA'O

23. EUFEMIO CHALA 24. JOSÉ CHAMACE 25. JOSÉ CHAMIZO 26. RAÚL CLAUSELL 27. ÁNGEL CLAUSELL

28. DEMETRIO CLAUSELL 29. JOSÉ CLAUSELL 30. ELOY CONTRERAS 31. ALBERTO CORBO 32. EMILIO CRUZ

33. JUAN FELIPE CRUZ 34. ORESTES CRUZ 35. HUMBERTO CUEVAS 36. CUNY 37. ANTONIO DE BECHE

38. MATEO DELGADO 39. ARMANDO DELGADO 40. RAM"N DESPAIGNE 41. JOSÉ DÍAZ CABEZAS

42. ANTONIO DUARTE 43. RAM"N FERNÁNDEZ OJEDA 44. RUDY FERNÁNDEZ 45. FERRÁN ALFONSO

46. SALVADOR FERRERO 47. VICTOR FIGUEREDO 48. EDUARDO FORTE 49. UGARDE GALÁN

50. RAFAEL GARCÍA MU'IZ 51. ADALBERTO GARCÍA 52. ALBERTO GARCÍA 53. JACINTO GARCÍA

54. EVELIO GASPAR 55. ARMADA GIL Y DIEZ CABEZAS 56. JOSÉ GONZÁLEZ MALAG"N 57. EVARISTO GONZÁLEZ

58. EZEQUIEL GONZÁLEZ 59. SECUNDINO GONZÁLEZ 60. RICARDO GRAO 61. BONIFACIO GRASSO

62. RICARDO JOSÉ GRAU 63. OSCAR GUERRA 64. JULIÁN HERNÁNDEZ 65. FRANCISCO HERNÁNDEZ LEYVA

66. ANTONIO HERNÁNDEZ 67. GERARDO HERNÁNDEZ 68. OLEGARIO HERNÁNDEZ 69. SECUNDINO HERNÁNDEZ

70. JESÚS INSUA 71. ENRIQUE IZQUIERDO 72. OSMÍN JORRÍN 73. SILVINO JUNCO 74. ENRIQUE LA ROSA

75. IGNACIO LASAPARLA 76. JESÚS LAZO 77. ARIEL LIMA LAGO 78. RAÚL L"PEZ VIDAL 79. ARMANDO MAS

80. ENERLIO MATA 81. ELPIDIO MEDEROS 82. JOSÉ MEDINAS 83. JOSÉ MESA 84. FIDEL MESQUÍA

85. JUAN MILIÁN 86. FRANCISCO MIRABAL 87. LUIS MIRABAL 88. ERNESTO MORALES 89. PEDRO MOREJ"N

90. DR. CARLOS MUI'O, MD. 91. CÉSAR NECOLARDES ROJAS 92. VICTOR NECOLARDES ROJAS 93. JOSÉ NU'EZ

94. VITERBO O'RREILLY 95. FÉLIX OVIEDO 96. MANUEL PANEQUE 97. PEDRO PEDROSO 98. RAFAEL PEDROSO

99. DIEGO PÉREZ CUESTA 100. JUAN PÉREZ 101. DIEGO PÉREZ CRELA 102. JOSÉ POZO 103. EMILIO PUEBLA

104. ALFREDO PUPO 105. SECUNDINO RAMÍREZ 106. RAM"N RAMOS 107. PABLO RAVELO 108. RUBÉN REY

109. MARIO RISQUELME 110. FERNANDO RIVERA 111. PABLO RIVERA 112. MANUEL RODRÍGUEZ

113. MARCOS RODRÍGUEZ 114. NEMESIO RODRÍGUEZ 115. PABLO RODRÍGUEZ 116. RICARDO RODRÍGUEZ

117. JOSÉ SALDARA 118. PEDRO SANTANA 119. SERGIO SIERRA 120. JUAN SILVA 121. FAUSTO SILVA

122. ELPIDIO SOLER 123. JESÚS SOSA BLANCO 124. RENATO SOSA 125. SERGIO SOSA 126. PEDRO SOTO

127. OSCAR SUÁREZ 128. RAFAEL TARRAGO 129. TEODORO TELLEZ CISNEROS 130. FRANCISCO TELLEZ

131. JOSÉ TIN 132. FRANCISCO TRAVIESO 133. LEONARDO TRUJILLO 134. TRUJILLO 135. LUPE VALDÉS BARBOSA

136. MARCELINO VALDÉS 137. ANTONIO VALENTÍN 138. MANUEL VÁZQUEZ 139. SERGIO VÁZQUEZ 140. VERDECIA

141. DÁMASO ZAYAS

*15 additional executions were reported by The New York Times (on 2/6/59, 2/8/59, 3/16/59, and 4/2/59),

but names are unknown.



Next time you rock your Che shirt, ask yourself - What do I really know about Che?

the devolution of evolutionary theory

I know, as one might be quick to argue after this blog, that evolution in the strictest sense isnt necessarily advocated by the so called "intellectual elite" of this age. But to the average layperson, myself included until recently, misconceptive strongholds about the subject persist - to the borderline of prejudiced absurdity.



evolution= any process of formation or growth; development.

big bang = a theory that deduces a cataclysmic birth of the universe (big bang) from the observed expansion of the universe



In other words, something that was once a WHOLE, exploded and from this explosion onward we find the absolute root of the theory of evolution. In other words, destruction as evolution - a seeming paradox.



Take a coffee mug, for example. Or for that matter, a cherry bomb. Both have certain qualities as whole objects. The mug holds liquid, the cherry bomb holds potential energy, in the form of explosive powder. But when we smash a mug to the ground, or light the firework and it explodes, is the logical process that we sense a type of EVOLUTION of the objects? Is the mug now a super-mug, able to hold more or hold hotter liquids or walk, talk, or make sandwiches? Does a broken, shattered coffee mug take a step towards becoming a coffee maker or an espresso machine? Does a detonated cherry bomb take a step towards becoming a grenade or a rocket ship?



Do they not, in fact, take steps backward? Does explosion not precurse a De-evolution or ENTROPY ; a decline from the previous state? The mug becomes REDUCED to ceramic shards, a cherry bomb to fragments of paper and dust. The big bang to exploded scraps, albeit large and relatively (to such small beings as men) powerful ones.



Now, the lay evolutionist has two options. One, evolution came from a single speck of space dust that later became the big bang ball. But if this were the layman's truth, it should follow suit that we'd have a much neater, clearer and more specific term for this than the 'big bang.' For certainly as it stands now, its not called the space dust theory, nor probably does the layperson have access to the "proofs" of such a position. We find our "proofs" for the big bang from the expansion of the universe, red and blue stars, etc. Option one leaves the evolutionist's concept of big bang as a theory to be re-worked.



Option two is not much better i'm afraid. It would imply that from spacedust came an "evolution" of sorts into a massive (complete and perfect?) ball of energy which in turn exploded (devolved?) into our present situation. This could be true, but again requires a reworking of the theory of evolution. Evoltuion would then consist of a microcosmic beginning (dust) to a macrocosmic peak (big bang) and then BACK TO a finite amount of microcosmic matter being spewed across space ON WHICH it were possible to "evolve" again from single cell to antelope to human mind. Evolution would no longer be evolution. It would be a theory half expressed. There would be no evolution so to speak without its opposite side, devolution ; or the decline unto death. And in fact, in light of the circumstances of the bang - it seems our universe's expansion will one day run out of force and energy and stagnate, much as a shattered glass rests in pieces after a moment of scattering.


So ask yourself; is the universe evolving or winding down? Why are humans considered the more evolved of apes? Apes never destroyed their own planet... birds never developed biological weapons.... who's to say intellect isn't a curse? Loneliness, depression, self-realized inadequacies??? You don't often hear of chimpanzees jumping off buildings in their self-conscious despair.





This is exactly where science can be witnessed and seen for the frail, finicky old trickster that it is. Men claim allegiance to science as the Ultimate Explanation and then two weeks later, theories change and man's explanatory belief changes with it. YET he refuses to stop worshipping the concept of his own intelligence as Ultimate. The new scientific facts quickly become assimilated into our old collective understanding of science under the guise of an evolution of our knowledge and theories of how things work as a whole. But by this very definition, man will always be chasing His tail - we will never master the Perfect understanding or attain to the ultimate Knowledge and therefore our 'science' always has an "out." Science can be wrong one hundred out of one hundred times because it is never perfectly right, YET still be seen as infallible by all those men who ignorantly hold all those theories as Ultimate PROOF and Ultimate SCIENTIFIC FACT.



The only thing ultimate about science is that ultimately it will never be right because, ultimately, it depends on man's CURRENT and FLEXIBLE interpretation of his surroundings. Ultimately, man will never be perfect and therefore, science can never be as wholly reliable as men mistakenly believe it is.

protest parties

wrote this a couple days ago. this isnt meant to write off everyone at these functions, just that ive had some experience and this is some of my observations. not that anyone cares......



im sitting here watching cspan's live coverage of the protest in washington... been watching it for like a half hour or so.

there's a few things that strike me off the bat. One, it seems that much hasnt changed since my days of rolling around chicago with a gimungous beard and an african drum, marching with the wto protest that drew thousands of lefties at the time... trying to match the intensity or capture the "moment" of the wto protest turned incident in seattle.

fashion. its so damn fashionable to be at these protests. Im not discounting people's hearts for justice here, but its a commentary on the state of the mentality of the "movement." and i think its always been. the hippies of the 60s were cool as COOL in their time. if you werent with them , you were a "square." and its the same echoing now in a way. albeit not to that magnetude. but watching the cameras pan through the crowd, one can see the perpetuation of cool dripping off their outfits and their accessories. and if a movement is rooted about being cool, i think that its important to remember that coolness is a trend, always changing and never staying for long. even the big movement of the 60s, credited with ending the vietnam war, became tired and old and people moved on. by the time the 70s came through, i bet many of the same acid dropping hippies were running around doing trendy cokelines and listening to bullsh!t like funkytown and you can ring my bell.

its too trendy. thats why i went to the wto. everyone was doing it and there was a sense of perpetual boredom in our lives mixed with the possibility of impending excitement or change and I bought it. but, to me, it was more to be seen. more to check out the cute hippie chicks and be cool and play my drum and rock my cool beard and meet other dudes jamming out with drums and whatever. where else can you find that kind of a cross-section of like-minded people hanging out together in such numbers and in such proximity? its like the best party i'd ever went to.

the protest party.

anyway, aside from that i was listening to the speakers. God knows im not a Jon Stewart disciple or a Steven Colbare (sp?) spawn... and while i do view much of the left as being unknowingly influenced by media outlets like the daily show and colbare report, i wanted to hear something new or fresh or interesting or worthwhile from these supposed leaders of the protesting left. [who owns comedy central btw? its become the leftist version of the Fox News conservatorium for the perpetuation of right wing views.]

But they didnt have a whole lot to say. Every single speaker had a chant that was often times sounding longwinded and forced, receiving little crowd participation.

basically i learned this:

hugo chavez is apparently the new Che Gueverra.

george bush is the worst tyrant _EVER_. Well, number 3, behind napoleon and hitler.

the rapture is not an exit stategy.

no more US intervention anywhere ever.



1. Hugo Chavez has more bushisms than George Bush. I especially like the one about how "his only regret is never getting to meet [said author of an anti-america book] because he's dead." hmm. homedude was alive. I forget his name and am too lazy to look it up but if you've put up with my crap long enough, you should go to google and find it in two seconds if you're interested. its called harnassing support from the frustrated left. just "rank on" Bush like in an 8th grade studyhall and support is bound to flock by the drove. im going to be the first to put chavez's face in a communist beret style gueverra shirt. and then im going to a protest and just ring off the phone numbers.

2. thats great. ignorance disguised behind a socially acceptable propaganda trend. Whatever happened to Nero, Herod, Slobodan milosevic, Saddam Hussein, Pol Pot, Lyndon Johnson (???), Josef Stalin, Mussolini, Franco, numerous pharoahs, numerous roman emperors, numerous conquistadors, numerous leaders of empires.... but yeah, lets grab two dudes napoleon and hitler and shove bush in there without thinking twice because we're damn ignornant and thats whats cool and thats what we've been told so lets regurgitate it.

3. heh

4. yeah no US intervention until the next time your country is being overrun by guerillas or somebody and people are being slaughtered by the hundreds for being islamic or christian or non-communist or whatver. then you bet you'll be on the phone all day trying to ring up the US ambassador to your country, crapping your pants with a feverish hope that they'll come to your rescue... if we went in iraq for the supposed reason of ending human rights violations (look up the statistics on the Hussein regime), tim robbins and susan serandan wouldve been so close to the white house people'd have thought THEY were vice president. hotel rwanda shows how the international world failed to stop the genocide in rwanda and lefties all agree we should have. but when we leave iraq and there's civil war and genocide, will we eventually have to go back in because of the left's oft changing mind and the idea that the stage is set for bloody civil war and genocide over there already? will we leave only to be back? will the left end up coming under fire for "voting" to leave iraq if it only ends up making things worse over there? what if people start holding up signs showing hollywood bighitters and accusing them of failing to stop a mass genocide when they had the chance? will the tables turn?



who knows. im tired and dont care. im not a republican. im just waiting for my exit strategy to come through.... (not really)

movie preview for my short film

The official trailer for john language's first movie, the stop-motion animation EPIC movie "CRAPOCALYPSE NOW." You betta recognize!







january something

yeah

ive spent the last month juggling between my "real" job, digging frigging holes and shoveling rocks, and doing what i actually enjoy doing: film stuff. Well, not exactly film stuff but a stop motion animation project thats like a half hour long..



half hour of stop motion = like 2600 still shots

so ive got like 2600+ still shots, edited out like 300 or so, and ive got a last "scene" to shoot. ive edited the first 4/5ths of it to prepare it for voice/audio. all in all, ive already put in about 70 hours or so on this thing and it'll be probably more like 90-100 before its done and ready for release. i went and got a youtube director's account to enable a post of longer than ten minutes, and hopefully HOPEFULLY it'll be released in the middle of february. HOPEFULLY.

unfortunately the work of ingenuity that is windows movie maker has a bug or something on my pc and keeps crashing... i cant do transitions anymore! WTF!


so anyway, thats what im doing...

i'll go back to my 3 month hiatus now

something to remember

while the republicans are seemingly making a mess of everything (including, unfortunately, the concept of true christianity) , the dems are busy calculating exactly when and how high to throw their hands up to best suit their own desires. the big stinks over every republican morsel the past few months profited them towards gearing up for their november elections. its like slander-in-digsuise. Find a reason, exploit said reason , hopefully win an election or push forward some agenda, then get caught with pants down just like said republican. Then the republicans will step back in all shocked and appalled and campaign that if they get voted in the next election, this type of thing would never happen. big deal. lieberman got voted out , in part, for being painted the republicans favorite dem. meanwhile john mccain fills the same roll vice versa and nobody says a peep. its all lights and mirrors and standing on the x's and smiling on cue. thank you hillary, thank you W. , thank you Al Gore and the internet you invented, thank you john kerry and howard dean and dick cheney and whoever else. it really doesnt matter anymore. Liberalism sells and dudes like jon Stewart, michael moore, and whatever other new face are peddling. entertainment becomes political. Who owns the Daily show and Colbert report? Comedy Central. And comedy central leans left just like Fox News leans right. And theyre both in turn owned by big business with big agendas. It's all a b.s. rap to sucker your vote and take your dollar, often times through an intentional strongarm of manipulative plans in action. Neither side is immune because once someone gets into office, the special interest homies come through with their "benefits packages" of plane tickets and nice dinners and big game seats and expense accounts. and who can resist big business or big tobacco or big whoever? Money is the real guy in office. Even the presidents themselves are on the office of the dollar bill. i put no stock in this world "Come to me all who are weary and heavy laden, and I will give you rest." matt11:28 (?)

nutcases in a nutshell with my heart dipped in hell

MY GOSH it is so nice to be out of Los Angeles and be away from the mega-church.

Not that it didn't help me out and not that God didn't use it to teach me a "butt-load of crap," as Nacho Libre would say, but now that I'm out of thescene and can once again think with somewhat of a sober mind I can see how that place was eating me, andis currently eating many others, alive from the insides out.

I think it's interesting how theconcept ofpreaching the gospel turned into an almost exclusively narrow sighted event, focused on people in the streets and on drugs and in crisis situations who are far more willing to accept the invitation to altar call than your normal average Joe person. Why else would someonebe stepping into a "seeker friendly" church for the first time, as an outsider to the body of Christ?

Not thatI see a problem with the concept of going after the hurting.Jesus rolled with prostitutes and lepers, and I think we are correct in following his example. Hang out with the hurting andthe destitute, and tell them the "good news" [which is what the word "gospel" actually means]. Eternal life with a good God etc...

But I havea fewbones to pick with the byproducts of OUR faults as humans, trying to run seeker friendly churches like the one I lived at/worked at full time for the past three years.

What exactly *IS* the gospel?????? Do we even know anymore? What is this "good news" that people are all amped up on, running around with spiritual pride and a virtual complete lack of self-control when it comes to the fruits of the spirit and spiritual maturity?

Let me tell you something: WHO GIVES A FLYING F#CK ABOUT NUMBERS!??!? Who cares about altar call numbers, who cares about how many people are in your church, who cares about number of people you got to say the sinner's prayer last week?????? WHO CARES? And this is why you SHOULDN'T care: We don't know people's hearts. You could get 100 people to say the sinner's prayer (i was the outreach director of a major outreach ministry in arguably the biggest missionary field in the US, I've SEEN this with my own eyes) and it won't mean a thing! Why? Because sometimes people feel pressured to pray, or convicted by man and not by the Holy Spirit, or are appeasing the person witnessing or whatever.

Well, what about altar calls?? Same exact deal. I've seen "altar calls" of 200 people week after week after week after week after (snore....) week after week after week after (zzzzZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzz) week. And the pastor's are pretty much pinching their own asses, trying to goose themselves into feeling some sort of feeling for the same old routine that brings many of the same exact people to the front week after week. So, in my experience and to the best of my discernment - I'd say there's maybe .... 15-25 of those "200" per altar call who are new to the front or who are genuinely giving their hearts to Christ. NO small number indeed, considering one is enugh to make the angels rejoice. But i think sometimes our faithlessness in God's power is manifested collectively after dripping down from the people at the top who are so concerned, so often, with looking good and having fantastic P.R. and keeping the show rolling that they don't realize/can't bring themselves to realize that this "evangelistic counting" is really just bold-faced lying that eventually trickles down and poisons their own people. Discounting all the staff, altar workers, repeaters who'd go up to the front for a bake sale ortire alignment as fast and indifferently as they'd go for the altar call (some people are HIGHLY encouraged to go forward. Trust me), and people who are like the seeds from Jesus' parable that eventually prove to have fallen amongst thorns (get choked out of following Christ by the cares of the world) or who fall on rocky ground (those who get all excited at first but fall away because they have no root ------------------------ then you've only got a good handful of people going up there genuinely getting "saved." And the leaders all know it yet continue in their "exaggerations" of the numbers.

Again, not to say God doesn't move and touch people's lives greatly during these moments. Just that He doesn't need our help to try and finish His awesome work. It's not like His work is found lacking at the end of the day and we need to pad His numbers to redeem Him to His own people.

And church numbers. If i hear another pastor of a mega-church talking about "church growth" and the fact that if you're church isn't growing rapidly from year to year that you have a stale church and a big problem, Im going to throw up. In fact, I think it's HEALTHY for a church to sometimes go through a decline; weed out the ones who aren't really interested in hearing God's true voice. Too often, churches tip toe on eggshells while trying not to offend their members so they preach like one island verse a Sunday and then "expound" on it with whatever life's lessons they have from their own personal lives, tell some jokes, and thenhit the doors by 11:30. It keeps people coming back because many people HATE the concept of sitting in church and being bored by the pastor so if the pastor keeps it to 20 mins, the chances they'll come back are huge.

But the point is this: if you actually PREACH the word of God, His sheep know His voice. You will gain who you are supposed to gain, find who you are supposed to find. And if you lose 300 full-yet-empty seats in the process, oh well! At least you genuinely tried to get them saved too, genuinely tried to give them a chance to hear what the Bible really has to say. What God really has to say.

One of the fastest quoted scriptures in the Bible is Hosea 4:6 "my people are destroyed from lack of knowledge," yet there are very few pastors and preachers out there who are actually preaching the Bible and not instead justa bunch of tangents en route to another "incredible, super-duper, ridiculously successful" altar call after the likes of which we can chalk up numbers, pat eachother on the asses, and call it a day.

It's this type of fakeness that turns off God's own people. It this whole "frost-tip my hair, im a dude but i wear foundation, metrosexual, fake smiling fake handshakes fake "good to see you/nice to meet you", fake salvation, FAKE CHURCH FALSE IDOL" type of mentality that dupes poor people into thinking this is the way the church is really supposed to be.

NEWS FLASH YOU CORNY, LOST & POOR SONSOFBITCHES - God doesn't care what we look like on the outside! God doesn't care about all the good works in the world if our heart isn't right! Stop trying to redeem yourselves to the world. No more "hey guys, look here - we're cool too! Look, LOOK!!!! We're Hollywood, check out our lighting and cool guitar riffs! We're cool too!!!"

We're called to be the head and not the tail, and when a church runs around trying to grab onto and hang onto the coat heels of some "celebrity" so and so to get them and come visit their church and hype the crap out of it before hand - thats what I call being the tail. Chasing after the world. Yknow what? I dont care if Billy Blanks the Tae Bo guy comes to your church. I don't care if the supporting actress girl from "You Got Served" or whatever comes to your church. I don't care if Harrison Ford's body double is coming to speak at your church! WHO CARES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Stop grab-assing the world with little tic tac testimonies to boost your numbers when the people that are already in your church are dying like flies in their ignorance.

truth in ministry

sometimes that title seems like an oxymoron to me...

I was the intern director of a name ministry at a BIG name ministry in Los Angeles.  Been here for three years.  Been a staff for like a year an a half of that. 

Always loved to smoke the weed.  Seriously.  Loved it.  My whole life.  Never had a problem with hard drugs, never really liked to drink.  Always loved the bud. 

Stayed clean my entire time in Los Angeles minus the annual trips back to the homeland.  But in L.A. , was always clean.

One of my best friends here is an ex heroin addict.  Junkie of junkies.  Not like the "junkie" that the SWPD cop called me when he arrested me for a dimebag and $5.00 bowl.  Real junkie junkie.  LIKE, almost died junkie.

To be fair, even before i took off and smoked bud with him, I was looking.  Which, to the secular (nonchristian) ear, is absolutely not a big deal to smoke some weed here and there.  But in ministry, I might as well be jamming needles in my arm while looking at child pornography while shoving razor blades up my ass.  That's just the way the church is - liking to be clean on the outside while on the inside they're full of the same exact s**t everyone else is.

So, eventually I was living that old churchy double-life everyone's come to expect from us christians.  Smoking bud, driving around with possession on me, ducking the powers that be, etc... 

Smoking bud with old christian friends...  ducking my pastor's daughter girlfriend's calls.  Or beating around the truth of where i was or what i was doing.

Finally, I felt i loved her (and God) enough to tell her i was smoking again.  To her, being the churchy churchy churched girl her whole life, it was like a brick to the face.  But she bounced back.  Told her I'd quit.  No big deal.

Next day my buddy shows up with bomb hash.  Man the devil knows how to work it with me.  So i was like, all chivalrously turning down the hash for a few days.  But, like I said, the devil knows me and that if he keeps persisting like that, I'm done for.  So i was done for.  Smoking the good buds, the medical prescription buds that'll shut your mind off on you.  The high life for weed connoseurs.

Dodging phone calls, dodging accountability, dodging the powers that be.  Dodging the heart of my fiancee.  Dodging my own heart.  Dodging, most importantly to a man who firmly believes and has set himself a part for the purposes thereof, God Himself.

Then old church buddy number two starts rolling around everyday.  Bringing them good smokes.  But he's slipping.  Drinking now.  Occasionally and then more occasionally and then driving occasionally after drinking occasionally and occasionally being a little bit too f**ked up to drive but occasionally driving occasionally after occasionally drinking a bunch of beers and smoking a bunch of weed, occasionally driving his ministry vehicle back to the ministry house where he NOT so occasionally lives.  He's occasionally there full-time.

Church buddy # 3.  Known this guy forever, too.  He's the type of guy who you have to worry about.  Quiet.  Lonely.  Insecure.  But has a great heart and is actually probably the most anointed worship leader I've ever seen in my life.  Which says a lot, to a dude who's been INSIDE the church full-time for the last four years. 

Number 3 started smoking cigarettes again, then started smoking bud again.  Then smoked bud like everyday, driving around his ministry vehicle (both vehicles belonging to ministries and NOT them personally) and getting pulled over acouple times just for LOOKING messed up.  Which says a lot, considering this is L.A. and like half an hour ago i saw some dude spun on crystal or something almost run down an older lady in a crosswalk out in Hollywood and nobody cared.

Number 3 has a friend, who's not my friend, we'll call him Tom.  Tom is also a heroin addict.  Tom has a buddy we'll call Frank who is addicted to crack rock.  Both these dudes, Tom and Frank, are from Park City Utah and come from filthy rich white families.  Both these dudes call themselves christians and both went to church here for at least a good number of months.  In case it sounds familiar, Park City is where they do the Sundance music festival every year.

So church buddy 3 and these two clowns hit the bars, get ripped and go down to skid row to score their perspective drugs.  H and C.  Heroin and crack.

Tom shoots up and turns white immediately.  Passed out.  3 thinks he's dying, starts slapping him on the face and freaking out.  Frank is cracked out, which means calloused and detached and therefore not realizing his homey is about to die on his livingroom couch.

Tom's lips turn blue, face goes so pale, and comes an inch away from death.  Wakes back up, says "i'm hungry," and goes back to life as normal.  f**king junkies.

Ahhh the church.  a point:

When i went back to the weed after i swore to the girl i LOOOOVE so much that I'd stop, i realized something:  If smoking weed is not a big deal, why can't i stop for the one i love so much?  Why did it lead to my homeboys getting back into their old patterns and driving drunk, smoking crack, or shooting dope?  Why was it harder to break than I'd ever thought it would be?

Because it's deceptive.  We do it in dark places, where people can't see.  It's deceptive.  Hiding in the darkness, hiding from the threat of punishment and consequence.  And it can get on top of you.  Look at the burnouts in this world.

 That stuff can't be happening in the church.  We aren't called to smoke herb and get drunk like we used to.  We're supposed to be done with that stuff; have something better than that stuff. 

So i got rid of the sack i had just bought, confessed to my fiancee that i was smoking again- and what happens?  The next day my homeboy shows up and says "you wanna meet god?" 

"god" was the name of the new bud he had gotten, and it was trying real hard to live up to its name.  I was tempted, but stayed straight and havent smoked ever since.  Just funny to SEE with my own eyes the devil try and get at me for real. 

Stood up in front of the whole ministry, in front of people i've been a role model and an example to.  In front of people i've disciplined and counseled. People i've reamed out and people i've cried over. And told the whole thing.  Admitted the whole thing.  And I'm done.  I'm walking in the light now and not hiding in the darkness. 

Tom...  Tom will probably die.  And it's interesting to look into someone's face who's young and vibrant and handsome and know that he's one day going to be found dead in some Super8 hotel room, somewhere far away from his family.  Somewhere far away from everyone that loves him.  Surrounded by people who don't give a s**t and won't bat a lash at another dead white kid being wheeled out of a hotel.

Frank will probably downward spiral.  If he doesn't plug back into church and have people to lift him up, he'll probably be there when Tom dies and will probably kill himself after he comes sober and realizes what just happened.

Number 3 will probably get kicked out of the ministry and the church if he doesnt come clean and clean up his act, and will probably end up living in his parents house, sleeping on the living room couch.

Number 2 will probably get pulled over for D.U.I. eventually, in a ministry vehicle...  which will completely ruin his life and lose his job and his place.

Number 1 will hopefully stay clean.  But it's always tough when you're an ex-junkie.  Cuz you're never really an EX-junkie, you're just a junkie who hasn't shot in awhile.  Sometimes situations turn to slip-n-slides and you're back to your old mess in a matter of minutes.

These, of course, are worst case scenarios.  but these people have been flirting with worst case scenarios for awhile now.  Real life people flirting with real life disaster...

I will stay clean. 

 

 

Male - 28 years old
LOS ANGELES, CA
United States
Bookmark and Share
Blog Archive
Pages: 1 2 3 4